A 119 day old warning about this river was added. Click on comments below to read it.

North - Below Staunton Dam to Spring Creek (Route 727)


North, Virginia, US

Disclaimer

Below Staunton Dam to Spring Creek (Route 727)

Usual Difficulty II-IV (for normal flows)
Length 26 Miles
Avg. Gradient 15 fpm
Max Gradient 46 fpm

Gauge Information

Name Range Difficulty Updated Level
NORTH RIVER NEAR STOKESVILLE, VA
usgs-01620500 100 - 250 cfs II-IV 01h26m 2.9 cfs (rc= -0.6 )


River Description

Virginia Whitewater, Roger Corbett



This is a whitewater run through a remote beautiful gorge. Challenges include ledges, sloping ledges and Alder thickets at high water. This river has the unfortunate distinction of being one of the few VA rivers where a paddling fatality has occurred. There is a hiking trail that crosses the river frequently for scouting and rescue. It's a beautiful hike as well.
StreamTeam Status: Not Verified
Last Updated: 2002-04-24 21:44:05

The worm in the Gorge

Detail Trip Report  The worm in the Gorge  North, VA(96.17KB .jpeg)

Taylor showcases his skills

Detail Trip Report  Taylor showcases his skills  North, VA(86.70KB .jpeg)

Joel M. displays his battle wounds

Detail Trip Report  Joel M. displays his battle wounds  North, VA(97.12KB .jpeg)

Stokesville HEC-RAS model

Detail Trip Report  Stokesville HEC-RAS model  North River, VA(98.58KB .jpeg)

Stokesville Gauge

Detail Trip Report  Stokesville Gauge  North River (Shenandoah), VA(162.24KB .jpeg)

Main drop near the takeout

Detail Trip Report  Main drop near the takeout  North River, VA(149.81KB .jpeg)


Gauge Information

Gauge Description:

Gauge is near takeout of run. Top level is a guess. Cootes Store at 5 ft is also a runnable indicator.

Gauge Information

Name Range Difficulty Updated Level
NORTH RIVER NEAR STOKESVILLE, VA
usgs-01620500 100 - 250 cfs II-IV 01h26m 2.9 cfs (rc= -0.6 )

RangeWater LevelDifficultyComment
100 - 250 cfs barely runnable-high runnable II-IV

Report - Reports of North Below Staunton Dam to Spring Creek (Route 727) and related gauges

Reports give the public a chance to report on river conditions throughout the country as well as log the history of a river.

Reports

When River/Gauge Subject Level Reporter
North River [VA] Main drop near the takeout Low, but runnable Chris Brock
North River (Shenandoah) [VA] Stokesville Gauge Low Bill Kirby
North River [VA] Stokesville HEC-RAS model 80 cfs Bill Kirby
North [VA] The worm in the Gorge n/a Charles Finley
8y89d11h09m North [VA] Taylor showcases his skills n/a Charles Finley

WXPort

News




Journal Archive Articles

White Water on The Potomac

User Comments


2011-10-16 07:28:33 (117 days ago)
Chris PreperatoDetails
There is a stage gauge at the lake right above that stretch (Elkhorn Lake SG). So, you can use that
to see if the lake is full or not. Unfortunately I can only go back 30 days of data, but it appears
that a stage of 40.0 is approximately what "full" is for the lake, with anything over that flowing
over the dam. So, if the Stokesville gauge is showing 300cfs, but the dam is only at 30ft, chances
are its gonna be dry. It may even be more useful to gauge the run based on stage gauge, as anything
over 40ft is the river flow. A group paddled it on 10/15 (200cfs @ Stokesville, 41.1ft on SG) and
said it felt like canoe zero. So, its possible that the Stokesville gauge has changed as well.
http://www.afws.net/data/va/Augusta.htm

2011-09-07 01:48:47 (157 days ago)
Justin AbelDetails
Ran it today at around 130 cfs on the Stokesville gauge (maybe an inch or two above 0 on the put-in
bridge), and there was much more scraping than I anticipated, bit of a let down. If you're coming
from a distance, I'd say wait till the 200-300 cfs range as a minimum to make the trip worthwhile.
Plenty of strainers on the river, but nothing too extreme. Check the previous comments for the bad
one. Always keep an eye downstream, new ones are inevitable. A possible alternate take out would be
the left bank at Camp May Flaherty. You can see the buildings and climbing wall from the river.
It'll avoid the last lower mile which has multiple strainer pile-ups. And rapid wise, you won't
miss anything. Looking forward to seeing this one with more water.

2010-12-01 08:56:30 (436 days ago)
Chris PreperatoDetails
Paddled it today at levels between 6-700cfs on the Stokesville gauge. With the side streams coming
in, I'd say it was over 1000cfs of actual flow by the take-out. The rapids were largely class 3-3+,
with one section that was low Class 4 (towards where the river leaves the forest, consists of a
series of slides and big wave trains). The minimum is definitely too low, you could easily run this
over 1000cfs, just have to be on the lookout for strainers. There is one that's been there for a
few years; it comes after the river splits around an island about 1.5 miles in. There is a shallow
channel that juts off 90 degrees to the left, at low flows the right channel was a beaver dam, at
high flow, it looked like the correct channel to take. Problem is, when these channels come back
together, a really nasty strainer is across the entire river, chest high, with branches sticking
out from it that make it very dangerous because there are no eddies after the channels come
together. In the winter, it collects ice balls making it a river-wide wall. The key is to take the
shallow channel and get out before the two merge back together.

2009-12-11 10:08:48 (791 days ago)
Chris PreperatoDetails
Paddled it today at about 120cfs, and I can confirm that something in the 110 range would probably
be a reasonable minimum, wouldn't want to go much lower than I did. As for the strainers, at that
level, I found I was able to go over the first one (about 1/2 mile into the run), and under or just
around a few others. There is a particularly nasty one that occurs about a mile in, the river right
channel dams up, the left channel was very shallow and had 2 different logs across it (minor
issue), but when the channels met again, they flowed right into a chest high log that had a
limb/ice trap covering about half the river. Definitely catch an eddy above that one

2009-11-15 11:00:04 (817 days ago)
Rob TrundleDetails
Re: Strainers As of 2009 November there are 6 river wide logs that can't be crossed. None are
dangerous to anyone who is comfortable on this river, but it means getting out of your boat six
times. I would put minimum at 115-125 cfs, but I realize there are issues with reservoirs. We did
it at 108 and it was ok but not a great level.

2007-07-26 06:15:21 (1660 days ago)
anthony hangerDetails
there is currently a riverwide strainer a couple hundred yards down from the campground and a log
just below the surface in the last bend leading into the ledges there is a suspention bridge with
hiking trail (1/4 mile? boat carry to road hike trail to park area above GS camp) for those wanting
to make a class 3 trip.

2004-09-14 11:23:08 (2705 days ago)
Bill KirbyDetails
After some discussion with other boaters, I got curious about relating the USGS gage with minimum
runnable level. It so happened I have some detailed topo of the streambed near the USGS gage I did
as part of my doctoral dissertation. I used these data to make a digital model of the stream at the
gage to see what flow would give a minimum depth.<br>
<br>
It pretty much confirms what others have said; zero is probably between 80 and 100 cfs on the USGS
gage. An image above shows a plot of the HEC-RAS model of the shallowest part of the USGS gage site
reach with a flow of 80 cfs. Note that the maximum depth is a little over one foot. On the
principle that you can run the whole reach if you can float a boat at the first rapids at the
put-in, this suggests that the river below here is runnable. This isn't just paddlers' lore, it's a
principle of geomorphology that the channel is created by the hydrology, so as you move downstream
the channel widens, but contributions from tribs keep the depth similar. This all assumes rainfall
uniformly covering the watershed, so it's not all coming in one trib. Also it assumes full
reservoirs; if Staunton reservoir has been drawn down and the river is flowing into an empty hole
there may be no outflow at all.<br>
<br>
Water the take-out is at least four hours later than at the USGS gage, so if it's rising or falling
rapidly, watch out.

2003-11-19 18:51:27 (3005 days ago)
Ken DubelDetails
Regrets, but I disagree on the location of the gauge plus the relatively new one which was
mentioned is, I believe, the same gauge we've been looking at. The "near Stokesville"
part is misleading. The gauge is actually upstream of the two reservoirs which in turn are upstream
of the gorge. If both reservoirs are full then I think it's pretty much water in = water out minus
municiple consumption.

2003-06-12 11:15:48 (3165 days ago)
Dan RabunDetails
we ran this for the second time at 85 cfs (and steady) on the Stokesville gage, with a light shower
the night before our run. I would call this an enjoyable bare minimum. Not much scraping after the
first 1/4 mile, and still plenty of fun. About 30% of that flow was coming out of the Little River
(the gage is below the confluence), so I am guessing only 60 cfs or so was in the North River. It
was -1" on the painted put-in bridge at the campground, so 0" on the painted gage is
fairly accurate, and I would guess most people would use this as their minimum. Keep a constant eye
for strainers on this run, although we only had to walk around one.<br>

2002-04-18 07:44:49 (3585 days ago)
Matt MuirDetails
There's a relatively new gage at http://www.americanwhitewater.org/gauges/id/6817/ . The rumor is
that 100 or 150 cfs might be enough to make the North worth the trip.
Users can submit comments.

Rapid Descriptions

icon of message No rapids entered. If you know names, and locations of the rapids please contact and advise the StreamTeam member for this run.

Do more than just check gauges; join over 5,000 AW members today.

Join_or_Renew_Logo-200px

Join or Renew


Or, consider donating

Donate_Logo-200px

Donate


General Nonmember Message


 reach  
 state  
 reachlink  
 Below Staunton Dam to Spring Creek (Route 727), North Virginia, US (mobile)