AW Challenges FERC Decision on Enloe Dam (WA)
News Release - March 16, 2018
Conservation Groups Challenge FERC Decision on Enloe Dam
River advocacy groups filed a petition in
federal court today against the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) challenging its
recent decision to extend construction deadlines on the Enloe Hydroelectric Project on the
Similkameen River in north central Washington. Through the petition the groups seek to ensure
FERC complies with clear requirements of the Federal Power Act and allows for meaningful public
participation when making its decisions.
Despite strong local opposition, the Okanogan Public Utility District (OPUD) is currently seeking
to re-energize Enloe Dam, which has sat dormant in the Similkameen River since 1958. Multiple
economic analyses show that power generated by the project will cost far more than electricity
from other sources, burdening ratepayers that live in one of the most economically disadvantaged
counties in Washington. The PUD’s project would also divert the Similkameen River and
dewater the culturally, ecologically and recreationally significant Similkameen (a.k.a
“Coyote”) Falls downstream.
“As energy from wind and solar increase in the Pacific Northwest, and with an already
abundant hydropower supply in the region, the power from Enloe isn’t necessary,” said
Thomas O’Keefe, Pacific Northwest Stewardship Director with American Whitewater. Noting
that the PUD recently entered into an agreement to purchase power from Wells Dam for as long as
it needs the power, O’Keefe added, “the Similkameen River is a valuable resource to
the region for recreation, scenic values, and fish and wildlife. We believe there’s more
value in restoring the river to enhance these values.”
“OPUD faces a great deal of uncertainty about whether the project will be economically
sound,” said John Osborn, physician and coordinator of Sierra Club’s Columbia River
Future Project. “The PUD is required to do an aesthetic flow study but still plans to wait
until after the project is built, meaning it will not know how much water it will be able to
divert to generate power until it has sunk tens of millions of dollars into designing and
building the project. It’s more compelling to restore the river. Coyote Falls is an
increasingly important regional attraction because of an expanding local and regional trail
system, and salmon can be seen swimming above waterfalls to the base of the dam.”
The petition challenges FERC’s 2018 decision to grant the PUD additional time to begin
construction on the Enloe project. The Federal Power Act allows FERC to extend construction
deadlines just once, which it did for OPUD in 2015. In anticipation of missing its July 9, 2017
deadline, OPUD filed a request that FERC further delay the deadline by granting a
“stay.” FERC granted the request, and denied conservation groups’ attempts to
have a formal say in the matter. The groups contend that FERC violated the law when it granted
the PUD additional time to begin construction.
“OPUD’s FERC license allows it to operate Enloe until 2063,” said Jere
Gillespie of Columbiana. “To avoid red ink, OPUD will have no choice but to pass the costs
along to the ratepayers into the next generation. What makes sense for the Similkameen and for
ratepayers is to free the river of this cement plug and not throw good money after bad. A free
flowing Similkameen will enhance economic growth for the local community.”
The groups note that they have been and remain willing to work with the PUD to develop a path
forward for restoring the river that addresses ecological and cultural issues and the economic
concern for ratepayers.
The petition was filed today in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which provides appellate
review of the decisions by FERC. The petitioners are American Whitewater, Center for
Environmental Law & Policy, Columbiana, and Sierra Club. Andrew Hawley and Pete Frost of the
Western Environmental Law Center represent the Similkameen River advocates.
# # #